Interval arithmetic in groups – pass 2

This is a continuation of the Interval arithmetics in groups: Pass 1 post.

Let f: \mathcal{V}\times\mathcal{V} \rightarrow \mathcal{V} be a binary operation on a set \mathcal{V}. We will write this operation additively as f\langle x,y \rangle = x + y. Such operation defines another binary operation f^\mathcal{P} on on the powerset \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{V}) (set of subsets) of \mathcal{V} in a natural way: f^\mathcal{P} \langle X, Y \rangle = \{ x + y | x\in X, y\in Y\} for X,Y \subseteq \mathcal{V}.  The nice thing about f^\mathcal{P} is that it inherits interesting properties of f: if f is commutative, then so is f^\mathcal{P}, if ( \mathcal{V},f) is a semigroup, then (\mathcal{P}( \mathcal{V}), f^\mathcal{P}) is also a semigroup, if ( \mathcal{V},f) is a monoid, then (\mathcal{P}( \mathcal{V}), f^\mathcal{P}) is also a monoid, if ( \mathcal{V},f) is a group. then … well, never mind, we don’t need that anyway.

This means that all theorems about adding finite (indexed) collections of semigroup elements (and there are quite a couple in the Semigroup_ZF theory) can be reused for the operation on subsets of \mathcal{V} at little additional cost.

The setup for adding group subsets in the Gyula Lakos’s paper is different in that it assumes the existence of neutral element and defines how to add an infinite number of subsets of \mathcal{V}.

b.) More generally, suppose \{ A_\lambda \}_{\lambda \in \Lambda} is a countable indexed family of subsets of \mathcal{V}. Assume that 0 \in A_\lambda for all \lambda \in  \Lambda except for finitely many. Only in that case we define the algebraic sum \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda } A_\lambda as \{ \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda } a_\lambda : a_\lambda \in A_\lambda , a_\lambda = 0 \text{ for all } \lambda  \in \Lambda except for finitely many \}.

We can do something in that spirit for f^\mathcal{P} as well. Namely suppose that
(\mathcal{V}, f) is a monoid and A: \Lambda \rightarrow  \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{V}) is a an indexed collection of subsets of \mathcal{V} such that all but finitely many contain the neutral element (denoted 0). We can split the index set  \Lambda into two subsets, one called \Lambda_0 consisting of those \lambda\in \Lambda for which A_\lambda contains the neutral element, and the rest. Then we can define the sum of the family \lambda \mapsto A_\lambda of subsets of \mathcal (V) as follows:

\sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} A_\lambda := \left(\sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda \setminus \Lambda_0} A_\lambda\right) + \left(\bigcup_{F \in Fin\mathcal{P}(\Lambda_0)} \sum_{\lambda \in F} A_\lambda\right),

where Fin\mathcal{P}(\Lambda_0) is the set of finite nonempty subsets of \Lambda_0 and +, \sum are interpreted as the additive notation for f^\mathcal{P}. So what we do is we add all sets that do not contain 0, but for sets that do contain 0 we sum every finite subcollection and take the union of all sums obtained this way.

This nicely generalizes the concept of adding finite collections of sets of semigroups (where the \Lambda_0 is empty and there is only the first component of the sum above) and (in contrast to the Lakos’ approach) does not require selecting monoid elements from infinite collections of subsets of \mathcal{V}, i.e. does not require the axiom of choice.

Advertisements

Tags:

One Response to “Interval arithmetic in groups – pass 2”

  1. IsarMathLin version 1.6.8 released « Formalized Mathematics Says:

    […] subsets of that is defined naturally by any binary operation on . I discussed this in the “Interval arithmetic in groups – pass  2” […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: